p-dN2M7WZtRXv1r
Home > Written Reviews, Written Reviews > “BEAST” Hunted

“BEAST” Hunted

 

Review Written By Jeremy Butler

 

“We’re in his territory now.”

Given the film’s premise, this strikes me as the perfect tagline for the film. A family on safari finds themselves trapped and stalked by a lion with a bloodlust. It definitely evokes memories of the Val Kilmer and Michael Douglas-led 1996 film, The Ghost and The Darkness. In this instance, of course, they rely on the acting chops of Idris Elba to keep the film from descending into cliché. And while there are some situations that seem avoidable and unrealistic, the film did a great job of maintaining my interest for the duration.

(from left) Norah Samuels (Leah Jeffries), Dr. Nate Samuels (Idris Elba) and Meredith Samuels (Iyana Halley) in Beast, directed by Baltasar Kormákur.

Joining Elba is Sharlto Copley, another talent with an extensive resume. My only gripe about Copley is that he felt underutilized, and I felt there were intriguing developments with his character that if fleshed out would have added a greater degree of depth to his character. However, this of course was out of Copley’s control and in no way negative impacts his given performance. Just one of those things that results when you only have a limited amount of time to tell a complete story. Despite this, I still found Beast enjoyable and recommend the experience. I mean, come on, Idris Elba vs. a lion; that’s worth the price admission in itself.

 

(from left) Nathan (Idris Elba), Martin (Sharlto Copley), Mare (Iyana Halley) and Norah (Leah Sava Jeffries) in Beast, directed by Baltasar Kormákur.

Elba plays Dr. Nate Samuels, a recently widowed husband, who returns to South Africa where he first met his wife, on a long-planned trip with his two young daughters, Meredith and Nora. From the opening of the film, it is clear that this a family divided, and it easy to discern that recent death of Nate’s wife and the girls’ mother is the cause for the division. The rift is primarily between Nate and his eldest child, Meredith, as the latter clearly holds a great deal of resentment towards her father for his obvious prioritization of his career, which seemingly resulted in martial separation prior to her mother getting sick. The rift between the two is front and center from their opening exchange, and I believe that this played to both characters’ advantage. For the Nate character, it emphasized his regret over the separation and inevitable loss of his wife, as well as his desperation to heal the rift between himself and his eldest child. In reference to the Meredith character, it provided strike during pivotal scenes, as she tends to disregard her father’s instruction and act of her own volition, this disobedience landing her in hot water multiple times, with both the lion as well as her sister, who felt compelled to chew her sister out about airing her grievances during a life or death situation.

 

(from left) Meredith Samuels (Iyana Halley) and Martin Battles (Sharlto Copley) in Beast, directed by Baltasar Kormákur.

Joining the family is Martin (Copley), an old family friend and wildlife biologist, who takes them to a game reserve for a safari. This provides the set up for the conflict, as the group find themselves stalked by ferocious wild lion craving human flesh, as it begins attacking them and killing anyone in its path. The Martin character was an interesting one, as he is an important figure, but much of his history is not addressed. There was one element regarding some of his activities that I found very interesting, but unfortunately it wasn’t pursued. It was only hinted at very briefly early on and confirmed midway through the movie. I would have loved to have seen this aspect fully addressed. I think it would have given greater context to this character. I don’t want to ruin it for anyone, but this reveal showed that this ultimately morally good character did possess a darker side. In the grand scheme of the overall film, it does not affect it credibility, but to my mind, its inclusion could have added additional intrigue.

Now for the part that is going to decide whether or not you deem the film worth seeing: Elba’s inevitable confrontation of a crazed and bloodthirsty lion. I know what you’re thinking. Does the Dark Tower and The Suicide Squad actor hold his own? In an answer, yes, he does. Given that it is Idris Elba, I would expect no less, but given the type of character that he is playing, it was important that the battle appear authentic. Meaning, he couldn’t be seen laying the smackdown on the apex predator. There is a point during the pair’s final confrontation that was reminiscent of a two heavyweight boxers going toe-to-toe. This is made realistic by the fact that Elba’s character for the most part is never far from receiving a death blow, and he is fighting to survive, as anyone in that situation would be expected to be doing. Of course, there could only be one winner, and for the sake of a good ending, the inevitable was obvious. But how he won was going to be an important factor; brawn could not be used. Wit was going to have to be the deciding factor, and thankfully it was.

Categories: Written Reviews, Written Reviews Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.